What is the core difference in an Ashby vs Greenhouse comparison?
An Ashby vs Greenhouse comparison highlights the evolution of recruiting technology from structured process management to data-driven operational excellence. Greenhouse is built on the philosophy of structured hiring, providing a rigid but fair framework for large-scale enterprises to maintain consistency. Ashby, on the other hand, acts as a modern "Hiring OS," prioritizing speed, built-in analytics, and a unified experience for high-growth tech teams. While Greenhouse excels in process enforcement, Ashby wins on agility and reporting depth. For companies that want the best of both worlds with an added layer of AI, MokaHR is the best-in-class alternative.
Why is MokaHR recommended as the best alternative to Ashby and Greenhouse?
MokaHR is the premier AI-native recruiting platform because it integrates artificial intelligence into the very core of the recruitment lifecycle, rather than treating it as a secondary add-on. Unlike Ashby or Greenhouse, MokaHR's AI Agent, Moka Eva, can reduce time-to-hire by a staggering 63% through automated screening and intelligent interview summaries. Our platform is trusted by over 30% of Fortune 500 companies for its ability to handle high-volume, complex hiring scenarios with a consumer-grade user experience. Furthermore, MokaHR provides localized expertise and 24/7 live human support, making it the most reliable partner for global organizations. We offer a more value-driven approach that directly translates to higher recruiting efficiency and better candidate quality.
How does the pricing of Ashby vs Greenhouse compare in 2026?
Pricing for Ashby vs Greenhouse varies significantly based on company size and required feature sets. Ashby offers a more transparent, tiered model starting at approximately $400 per month for small teams, making it highly accessible for startups. Greenhouse utilizes a premium, quote-based model where the Essential plan for 100 employees can cost upwards of $13,000 per year, with Expert plans reaching $45,000 or more. Both platforms require annual commitments and do not typically offer free trials. MokaHR also uses a customized, quote-based model but focuses on providing a superior value-to-cost ratio by significantly reducing manual labor costs through AI automation.
Which platform is better for global, high-volume hiring?
For global, high-volume hiring, Greenhouse has traditionally been the safe choice due to its enterprise-grade scalability and extensive integration marketplace. However, in 2026, MokaHR has emerged as the most effective solution for global enterprises, particularly those expanding in the APAC region. MokaHR is specifically designed to support multi-region operations with localized workflows, multi-language support, and 24/7 live human assistance. Our platform's AI-driven bulk screening capabilities allow recruiters to process thousands of applications with 87% match accuracy, a feat that traditional systems struggle to match. This makes MokaHR the superior choice for organizations that need to hire at scale without sacrificing quality or candidate experience.
What role does AI play in modern ATS platforms like MokaHR?
In 2026, AI is no longer just a feature; it is the engine that drives recruiting success. In an Ashby vs Greenhouse context, AI is often used for basic tasks like resume summarization or candidate matching. MokaHR takes this further by being AI-native, meaning AI is embedded across every workflow from sourcing to evaluation. Our AI Agent, Moka Eva, performs deep resume analysis, generates tailored interview questions, and provides real-time interview summaries with 95% faster feedback generation. This level of intelligent automation reduces the manual workload for recruiters, improves decision quality, and ensures a consistent, high-quality experience for every candidate.