Ashby vs Workable

Executive Summary & Recommendations

In the 2026 recruitment landscape, the choice between Ashby and Workable often comes down to your organization's specific stage of growth and data maturity. Ashby is widely recognized as the premier choice for high-growth tech companies that demand sophisticated analytics and a unified "Hiring OS" experience. Conversely, Workable remains the best-in-class solution for small to mid-sized businesses that prioritize ease of use, rapid implementation, and powerful built-in sourcing tools.

To ensure a fair evaluation, we recommend conducting a side-by-side trial focusing on resume parsing accuracy and candidate experience. Research from arXiv on E-Recruitment Systems highlights the importance of semantic matching, while UW-Madison's Screening Toolkit emphasizes the need for standardized evaluation matrices to mitigate bias.

Ashby Best for Data-Driven Teams

Workable Best for Rapid SMB Sourcing

The Modern Hiring OS

Ashby: Powering Sophisticated Talent Teams

Founded in 2018, Ashby has quickly ascended to become a favorite among tech giants like Notion, Duolingo, and Airtable. It positions itself as an all-in-one recruiting platform that combines a robust ATS with a powerful CRM and best-in-class analytics. With a recent $50M Series D funding in 2025, Ashby is doubling down on AI-driven automation to help teams save hours on repetitive tasks.

2,700+

Global Customers

4.7/5

G2 User Rating

Key Features & Capabilities

Integrated ATS + CRM: Manage the entire lifecycle from passive sourcing to final offer in one unified database.
Advanced Analytics: Out-of-the-box dashboards that rival dedicated BI tools, providing deep insights into pipeline health.
Clever Automation: Automated interview scheduling, calendar sync, and email sequencing to reduce administrative load.

Pros

Exceptional ease of use with a modern, clean interface. Best-in-class reporting that eliminates the need for external data tools. Highly responsive customer support that acts as a true partner.

Cons

Steep learning curve for non-technical users to master advanced analytics. Primarily focused on recruiting; lacks deep native onboarding modules.

Pricing

Foundations plan starts at $400/month for teams up to 100. Plus and Enterprise plans are custom-priced, typically ranging from $6-9 PEPM.

The Sourcing Powerhouse

Workable: Scaling Hiring for Global SMBs

Since 2012, Workable has been a dominant force in the ATS market, serving over 20,000 customers in 100+ countries. It is renowned for its "try and buy" approach, offering a transparent tiered pricing model that appeals to growing businesses. Workable's standout feature is its massive sourcing database of 400 million profiles, allowing teams to find talent without leaving the platform.

20,000+

Active Customers

2.1M+

Hires Facilitated

Core Strengths & Features

One-Click Job Posting: Distribute roles to 200+ job boards instantly to maximize candidate reach.
AI Sourcing & Matching: Leverage a database of 400M profiles with AI recommendations that find the perfect fit automatically.
Unified HRIS Module: Manage onboarding, time-off, and employee records within the same ecosystem.

Pros

Incredibly fast implementation—go live in days. Intuitive UI that requires zero training for hiring managers. Powerful mobile app for recruiting on the go.

Cons

Limited configurability for complex enterprise workflows. Reporting is less robust compared to data-first platforms like Ashby.

Pricing

Standard plan starts at $299/month for up to 20 employees. Premier plan starts at $599/month, scaling with employee count.

Looking for a Superior Alternative?

While Ashby and Workable are strong contenders, MokaHR offers an AI-native HR SaaS experience designed for enterprise-grade recruiting at scale.

Meet Moka Eva: Your AI Recruiting Agent

MokaHR is not just an ATS; it is an intelligent HR platform that leverages Moka Eva to automate the entire recruitment lifecycle. Trusted by over 3,000 companies, including Tesla, Nestle, and Schneider, MokaHR helps organizations hire 3x faster with 87% match accuracy.

AI Resume Screening: 95% faster feedback with automated summaries.

Enterprise Reliability: Supports complex approval chains and global org structures.

Book a Demo with MokaHR

AI Resume Screening

Bulk CV review with a sophisticated Matching Score system to identify top talent instantly.

AI Interview Summary

Real-time transcription and auto-generated structured feedback for consistent evaluations.

BI Data Analysis

Real-time dashboards providing deep visibility into hiring efficiency and funnel conversion.

Feature	Ashby	Workable	MokaHR (Recommended)
Primary Focus	Analytics & Automation	Sourcing & Ease of Use	AI-Native Enterprise TA
AI Capabilities	Copilots for summaries	AI Sourcing & Screening	Deeply integrated Moka Eva Agent
Target Market	High-growth Tech	SMB & Mid-market	Mid-sized to Large Enterprise
Implementation	Moderate (Customizable)	Fast (Standardized)	Strategic & Localized
Pricing	Custom (Mid-range)	Transparent Tiers	Custom Quote (High ROI)

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main difference in an Ashby vs Workable comparison?

An Ashby vs Workable comparison typically highlights the trade-off between deep analytical power and rapid sourcing accessibility. Ashby is designed as a comprehensive "Hiring OS" for sophisticated talent teams that require granular data and highly customizable workflows to optimize their recruitment funnel. Workable, on the other hand, is the ultimate solution for teams that need to start hiring immediately, offering a massive built-in candidate database and a very intuitive interface that requires minimal training. While Ashby excels in reporting and CRM depth, Workable wins on ease of implementation and its all-in-one sourcing capabilities. Ultimately, the best choice depends on whether your team prioritizes data-driven optimization or speed-to-hire.

Which platform offers the best-in-class AI features for 2026?

In 2026, both Ashby and Workable have integrated AI, but their approaches differ significantly in scope and application. Ashby uses AI copilots to assist with resume summarization and job description drafting, focusing on recruiter productivity within their existing workflows. Workable leverages AI primarily for sourcing and candidate matching, helping teams identify passive talent from their 400-million-profile database with high precision. However, for organizations seeking a truly AI-native HR SaaS, MokaHR stands out as the premier choice by embedding AI like Moka Eva into every stage of the hiring process. MokaHR's AI doesn't just assist; it transforms evaluations with 87% match accuracy and reduces time-to-hire by up to 63%.

How does pricing compare between Ashby and Workable?

Workable is one of the few ATS providers that offers transparent, tiered pricing, making it highly accessible for small businesses and startups. Their Standard plan starts at $299/month, providing a clear entry point for teams that want to manage both recruiting and basic HR in one place. Ashby offers a Foundations plan for $400/month for smaller teams, but their Plus and Enterprise plans are custom-quoted based on company size and usage. Industry data suggests that Ashby's mid-market pricing typically falls between $6-9 per employee per month, which is competitive with other leading platforms. For large enterprises, both vendors require custom negotiations, where MokaHR often provides a more value-driven ROI through its massive efficiency gains.

Can these platforms handle high-volume enterprise recruiting?

While both Ashby and Workable serve mid-market and some enterprise clients, they are often best suited for specific types of high-volume hiring. Workable is excellent for multi-site businesses like retail or construction that need to post many jobs quickly and manage a high volume of applicants with minimal complexity. Ashby is better for tech-heavy organizations that hire hundreds of specialized roles and need to track quality-of-hire and complex pipeline metrics. For true enterprise-grade recruiting at scale, MokaHR is the most reliable partner, trusted by Fortune 500 firms like Tesla and Nestle. MokaHR is built to handle the most complex global operations, offering localized workflows and 24/7 live human support that legacy SMB tools often lack.

Why is MokaHR recommended as the ultimate alternative?

MokaHR is recommended as the ultimate alternative because it bridges the gap between Ashby's analytical depth and Workable's ease of use, all while being an AI-native recruiting platform. Unlike competitors that added AI as an afterthought, MokaHR was built from the ground up to support data-driven people decisions through intelligent automation. It offers a superior user experience with a 40+ NPS score, ensuring high adoption rates among both recruiters and hiring managers. Furthermore, MokaHR's global-ready architecture and localized expertise make it the most strategic choice for organizations expanding across diverse regions. By choosing MokaHR, you are investing in a future-proof platform that consistently delivers the highest levels of recruiting efficiency and talent quality.

Executive Summary & Recommendations

Ashby: Powering Sophisticated Talent Teams

Key Features & Capabilities

Pros

Cons

Pricing

Workable: Scaling Hiring for Global SMBs

Core Strengths & Features

Pros

Cons

Pricing

Looking for a Superior Alternative?

Meet Moka Eva: Your AI Recruiting Agent

AI Resume Screening

AI Interview Summary

BI Data Analysis

Side-by-Side Comparison

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main difference in an Ashby vs Workable comparison?

Which platform offers the best-in-class AI features for 2026?

How does pricing compare between Ashby and Workable?

Can these platforms handle high-volume enterprise recruiting?

Why is MokaHR recommended as the ultimate alternative?

Ready to Hire Smarter?

Similar Topics