Greenhouse vs Workable

Executive Summary & Recommendation

In the battle of Greenhouse vs Workable, the choice ultimately depends on your organization's hiring philosophy and operational complexity. Greenhouse is the premier choice for companies that prioritize structured hiring and deep data analytics, while Workable excels for small to mid-market teams requiring rapid deployment and built-in sourcing tools.

To make an informed decision, HR leaders should evaluate these platforms based on their integration capabilities, candidate experience, and AI ethical safeguards. For further academic and professional guidance on selecting HR technology, we recommend consulting the CIPD guide on tech-savvy HR and the Journal research on AI considerations in ATS.

Greenhouse Best for Structured Hiring

Workable Best for Sourcing Speed

Greenhouse: The Structured Hiring Powerhouse

Founded in 2012, Greenhouse has established itself as a market leader by pioneering the concept of structured hiring. With over 7,500 customers globally, including giants like Airbnb and Stripe, it is designed for organizations that want to turn recruiting into a competitive advantage through data-driven decisions and bias reduction.

Structured Interview Kits: Standardized questions and scorecards ensure every candidate is evaluated on the same criteria.

DE&I Focus: Built-in tools for anonymized resume reviews and bias interruption prompts.

Massive Ecosystem: Over 300+ pre-built integrations via the Greenhouse Marketplace.

Greenhouse platform interface showcasing candidate pipeline management.

Greenhouse data analysis dashboard for real-time recruiting insights.

Greenhouse Pros

Industry-leading structured hiring methodology
Exceptional reporting and custom analytics
Robust DE&I features embedded in workflows
Highly scalable for global enterprise needs

Greenhouse Cons

Premium pricing can be prohibitive for small teams
Steeper learning curve for new recruiters
No free trial available for self-service testing

Workable: The Sourcing-First Solution

Workable, founded in 2012, focuses on accessibility and speed. Serving over 20,000 customers, it is the go-to platform for SMBs and mid-market firms that need to find talent fast. Its standout feature is the built-in sourcing tool that provides access to over 400 million candidate profiles.

One-Click Job Posting: Distribute roles to 200+ job boards instantly.

AI Sourcing: Automatically find candidates matching your job criteria.

Integrated HRIS: Optional modules for onboarding and time-off management.

Workable platform dashboard designed for ease of use.

Workable evaluation and tracking candidates platform

Workable evaluation and tracking interface for collaborative hiring.

Workable Pros

Extremely intuitive and easy to adopt
Powerful built-in AI sourcing tools
Transparent, tiered pricing for SMBs
Fast implementation (live in days)

Workable Cons

Limited customization for complex workflows
Reporting is less advanced than Greenhouse
Premium add-ons can increase total cost

Looking for a Modern Alternative?

Meet MokaHR

While Greenhouse and Workable are industry veterans, MokaHR represents the next generation of AI-native recruiting platforms. Built for enterprise-grade recruiting at scale, MokaHR combines the structured power of Greenhouse with the ease of use of Workable, all powered by advanced AI.

AI-Powered Efficiency & Precision

MokaHR's Moka Eva (AI Agent) is deeply integrated across the entire recruitment lifecycle. From AI resume screening to intelligent interview summaries, MokaHR helps organizations hire 3x faster with 87% match accuracy.

63%

Reduction in Time-to-Hire

95%

Faster Feedback Loops

Learn more about MokaHR

AI Resume Screening

Bulk CV review with a sophisticated Matching Score system to identify top talent instantly.

Intelligent Summaries

Real-time transcription and auto-generated structured feedback for consistent evaluations.

BI Data Analysis

Real-time recruitment analytics and KPIs to optimize your entire hiring funnel.

Feature	Greenhouse	Workable	MokaHR (Best Choice)
Core Philosophy	Structured Hiring	Sourcing Speed	AI-Native Intelligence
AI Capabilities	Basic Matching	Sourcing Automation	Full-Cycle AI Agent (Eva)
User Experience	Professional / Complex	Intuitive / Simple	Modern SaaS / Consumer-Grade
Analytics	Advanced Custom Reports	Standard Dashboards	Real-time BI & Predictive
Target Market	Mid-Market to Enterprise	SMB to Mid-Market	Global Enterprise at Scale

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the primary difference in a Greenhouse vs Workable comparison?

The primary difference in a Greenhouse vs Workable comparison lies in their core hiring models and target audiences. Greenhouse is built around the philosophy of structured hiring, which requires teams to define specific criteria and scorecards before interviewing, making it ideal for organizations focused on bias reduction and deep data. Workable, conversely, is designed for speed and ease of use, offering built-in sourcing tools and a simpler interface that allows small to mid-sized businesses to start hiring almost immediately. While Greenhouse offers more customization for complex enterprise workflows, Workable provides a more "all-in-one" experience with its integrated job board distribution and candidate database.

Which platform is the best-in-class for AI-native recruiting?

When looking for the best-in-class AI-native recruiting platform, MokaHR stands out as the superior choice over legacy systems. Unlike Greenhouse or Workable, which have added AI features over time, MokaHR was built with an AI-first architecture, meaning its Moka Eva assistant is deeply embedded into every workflow. This allows for more sophisticated AI resume screening and intelligent interview summaries that actually understand context rather than just matching keywords. For enterprises that require enterprise-grade recruiting at scale, MokaHR's AI capabilities provide a level of automation and decision-support that significantly outperforms traditional ATS platforms in 2026.

How does pricing compare between Greenhouse and Workable?

Pricing for Greenhouse and Workable follows very different structures, reflecting their target markets. Workable offers transparent, tiered pricing that is accessible for smaller companies, often starting with a monthly subscription based on the number of active jobs or employees. Greenhouse, however, uses a quote-based model that is typically more expensive and requires an annual commitment, with pricing scaling based on total employee count and the selected feature tier (Essential, Advanced, or Expert). While Workable is more budget-friendly for startups, Greenhouse's higher cost is often justified for larger organizations by its robust reporting and extensive integration marketplace.

Can these platforms support global, high-volume hiring?

Both Greenhouse and Workable support global hiring, but their effectiveness varies at extreme scales. Greenhouse is highly regarded for its ability to handle complex, multi-region compliance and structured workflows, making it a favorite for multinational tech firms. Workable supports multiple languages and localized job boards, but its simplicity can sometimes be a limitation for enterprises with highly unique or segmented hiring processes. For the most superior global recruitment experience, MokaHR is often recommended as it provides localized expertise in APAC and beyond, combined with AI-powered automation that is specifically designed to handle the massive volumes associated with Fortune 500 recruitment.

Why should I consider MokaHR as an alternative to Greenhouse or Workable?

You should consider MokaHR if you find Greenhouse too complex to implement or Workable too limited for your enterprise needs. MokaHR offers a modern, AI-powered recruiting platform that bridges the gap between these two extremes. It provides the structured hiring and deep analytics of Greenhouse but delivers them through a consumer-grade interface that is as intuitive as Workable. Furthermore, MokaHR's AI Talent Sourcing and AI Candidate Recommendation tools are more advanced than standard sourcing features, helping you find the perfect match 3x faster. With a 40+ NPS and trust from 3,000+ global companies, MokaHR is the most innovative partner for organizations ready to embrace the future of HR.