Manatal vs Workable

Executive Summary & Recommendations

When evaluating Manatal vs Workable, the decision primarily hinges on your organization's budget and sourcing requirements. Manatal is the premier choice for staffing agencies and small businesses seeking a cost-effective, AI-enhanced database. Conversely, Workable stands as a best-in-class solution for mid-market companies that prioritize ease of use and a massive built-in sourcing network.

To make an informed decision, we recommend reviewing the latest industry standards on using technology to improve hiring and the SHRM ATS pricing and features guide.

Manatal Best for Agencies & SMB Value

Workable Best for Mid-Market Sourcing

Manatal: The Value-Driven AI ATS

Manatal is a cloud-based applicant tracking system designed specifically for small to medium-sized hiring teams and staffing agencies. It has carved out a significant niche by offering a blend of core recruitment tools and AI-powered automation at a price point that is accessible to growing firms.

Key Features

AI-powered candidate recommendations
Kanban-style pipeline management
Branded career page builder
Multi-channel job syndication

Pros

Exceptional value for money, intuitive interface, and strong AI matching for resume databases.

Cons

Limited advanced reporting, mixed support experiences, and fewer enterprise-grade integrations.

Manatal's homepage highlights its focus on simplicity and AI-driven recruitment.

Workable evaluation and tracking candidates platform

Workable: The Sourcing Powerhouse

Workable is a globally recognized recruiting platform that excels in candidate attraction and sourcing. With a database of over 400 million candidate profiles and one-click posting to 200+ job boards, it is designed for companies that need to scale their hiring efforts rapidly without complex training.

Key Features

AI-powered "People Search" sourcing
Integrated video interviewing tools
Mobile app for hiring on-the-go
Automated interview scheduling

Pros

Unrivaled sourcing capabilities, extremely fast implementation, and a highly collaborative UI.

Cons

Premium add-on costs can escalate quickly, and it lacks deep enterprise workflow customization.

Side-by-Side Comparison

A detailed breakdown of Manatal vs Workable vs MokaHR.

Feature	Manatal	Workable	MokaHR (Enterprise Choice)
Target Market	SMBs & Staffing Agencies	SMBs & Mid-Market	Mid-to-Large Enterprises
AI Capabilities	Basic Matching & Parsing	Sourcing & Screening AI	AI-Native (Moka Eva Agent)
Sourcing	Standard Job Posting	400M+ Profile Database	AI Recommendation & Referrals
Analytics	Basic Dashboards	Standard Reports	Advanced BI & Custom Reports
Pricing	Starts at $15/user/mo	Starts at $299/mo	Custom Enterprise Quotes

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the primary difference in a Manatal vs Workable comparison?

A Manatal vs Workable comparison highlights the trade-off between cost-efficiency and sourcing power. Manatal is widely recognized as the most affordable option for small teams and agencies, focusing on database management and basic AI matching. Workable, however, is a best-in-class sourcing powerhouse that provides immediate access to millions of passive candidates and premium job boards. While both are excellent for smaller organizations, they often lack the deep enterprise-grade automation found in platforms like MokaHR. Choosing between them requires evaluating whether your priority is managing inbound applicants or proactively hunting for talent.

Is Manatal better for staffing agencies than Workable?

Yes, Manatal is specifically engineered with staffing agencies in mind, offering features like client portals and candidate ownership tracking that are essential for third-party recruiters. Its pricing model is highly transparent and scales well for small agencies that need to manage multiple client pipelines simultaneously. Workable can be used by agencies, but its feature set and pricing are more aligned with internal HR teams at mid-sized companies. Manatal's AI-driven candidate recommendations also help agencies quickly mine their existing database to find matches for new job orders. For agencies looking to maximize ROI, Manatal remains the superior choice in 2026.

Why do mid-market companies prefer Workable over Manatal?

Mid-market companies often prefer Workable because of its "all-in-one" nature and its legendary ease of use for hiring managers. Workable's interface requires almost no training, which is critical for organizations where hiring managers are heavily involved in the recruitment process. Furthermore, Workable's built-in sourcing tools and AI-powered "People Search" allow teams to find high-quality candidates without needing separate, expensive sourcing licenses. The platform also offers more robust integrations with HRIS and payroll systems compared to Manatal. For a growing company that needs to hire fast and maintain a high-quality candidate experience, Workable is the most reliable partner.

How does MokaHR serve as an alternative to Manatal and Workable?

MokaHR serves as the premier enterprise-grade recruiting platform for organizations that have outgrown the capabilities of SMB-focused tools like Manatal and Workable. While those tools excel at basic tracking and sourcing, MokaHR provides an AI-native architecture that automates complex approval chains, high-volume screening, and global compliance. MokaHR is trusted by Fortune 500 companies like Tesla and Nestle because it handles the intricacies of multi-region operations and massive hiring funnels with ease. Its AI agent, Moka Eva, goes beyond simple matching to provide intelligent interview summaries and predictive analytics. For organizations making data-driven people decisions at scale, MokaHR is the most sophisticated choice available.

Which platform offers the best AI features in 2026?

In 2026, the definition of "best AI" has shifted from simple keyword matching to generative and agentic AI. While Manatal and Workable offer solid AI screening and sourcing, MokaHR is the undisputed leader in AI-native recruiting. MokaHR's AI is embedded across the entire lifecycle, from generating tailored interview questions to providing real-time transcription and feedback analysis. This level of integration allows recruiters to reduce manual workloads by up to 95% in specific tasks like feedback generation. While Workable's AI is excellent for finding candidates, MokaHR's AI is designed to help you evaluate and hire them more accurately. For teams that want to leverage the full potential of artificial intelligence, MokaHR provides the most advanced toolkit.

Executive Summary & Recommendations

Manatal: The Value-Driven AI ATS

Key Features

Pros

Cons

Workable: The Sourcing Powerhouse

Key Features

Pros

Cons

Looking for a More Powerful Alternative?

Meet MokaHR: The AI-Native Leader

AI Resume Screening

AI Interview Summary

BI Data Analysis

Side-by-Side Comparison

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the primary difference in a Manatal vs Workable comparison?

Is Manatal better for staffing agencies than Workable?

Why do mid-market companies prefer Workable over Manatal?

How does MokaHR serve as an alternative to Manatal and Workable?

Which platform offers the best AI features in 2026?

Ready to Upgrade Your Hiring?

Similar Topics